Evidence-Based Resistance Training: Biomechanical Control Training (BCT) at the IFBB Nordic Academy

Mar 02, 2025
IFBB Nordic Academy
Evidence-Based Resistance Training: Biomechanical Control Training (BCT) at the IFBB Nordic Academy
18:36
 

Welcome to the cutting edge of resistance training! At the IFBB Nordic Academy, we're committed to providing our students with the most advanced, science-backed methods for achieving peak physical performance and physique. That's why we're thrilled to introduce Biomechanical Control Training (BCT), a core component of our Advanced Resistance Training Course.we believe the key to unlocking true strength and preventing injury lies not just in how much you lift, but in how you move. That's why our Advanced Resistance Training Course centers around BCT – a revolutionary, evidence-based approach that transforms how you train yourself and your clients. This isn't another fitness fad; it's a fundamental shift in understanding how the body actually works.

The Problem with Traditional, Load-Focused Training - Blind Spot

Traditional resistance training often focuses on isolated exercises,focus on sets, reps, and increasing weight, and a "no pain, no gain" mentality. While this approach can build muscle, it often overlooks the fundamental principles of biomechanics – the science of how our bodies move. This can lead to:

  • Hidden Weaknesses: You might be strong in certain positions, but unknowingly compensating for underlying movement limitations (Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; Washabaugh et al., 2020). This creates imbalances and sets you up for plateaus.
  • Increased Injury Risk: Forcing your body into movements it's not prepared for, even with lighter weights, can damage joints and tissues over time (Vanrenterghem et al., 2017; Moir et al., 2017).
  • Inefficient Results: You're working hard, but not smart. You're not fully engaging the right muscles or optimizing your movement patterns for maximum benefit (Walker et al., 2016; Jenkins et al., 2017).

What is Biomechanical Control Training (BCT)?

BCT is a systematic approach that prioritizes mastering movement before maximizing load. It's built on the well-established principle that proper biomechanics are fundamental to both performance and injury prevention (Donnelly et al., 2020; Faigenbaum & Myer, 2009; Zhao, 2024; Lloyd, 2021). Research consistently shows that programs incorporating biomechanical principles improve strength, speed, and jump height (Myer et al., 2005; Lephart et al., 2005) and significantly reduce injuries (Hewett & Bates, 2017; Sasaki et al., 2019).

The Three Pillars of BCT: 

The BCT method, exclusive to the IFBB Nordic Academy's Advanced Resistance Training Course, is built upon three interconnected pillars:

1. Structural Integrity (SI): Your Body's Blueprint 

  •  What it is: Understanding your unique skeletal structure – how your bones and joints are designed to move. This isn't about "perfect" anatomy; it's about recognizing your individual anatomy.
  •  Why it matters: Variations in hip socket depth, spinal curvature, and even the shape of your bones influence your movement capabilities and potential injury risks (Gentil et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2016; Colado & García-Massó, 2009). Each joint has inherent limitations that must be respected (Kipp et al., 2011; Flanagan et al., 2015; Chiu, 2017). Knowing bony landmarks and muscle attachments allows for targeted muscle activation (Dooley et al., 2020; Tagliaferri et al., 2015; Castro et al., 2020; Castro et al., 2021).
  •  How we apply it: Thorough assessments of joint structure, range of motion, and posture. We don't just look; we understand how your body is built.

2. Movement Mastery (MM): Owning Your Movement 

  •  What it is: Achieving precise, controlled movement through the full, intended range of motion of an exercise before adding significant weight. It's about quality, not quantity.
  •  Why it matters: Good movement quality directly translates to better muscle activation, force production, and reduced injury risk (Blazevich et al., 2020; Bennett et al., 2020; Van Roie et al., 2020). You can often achieve similar (or even better) results with less perceived effort by focusing on movement mastery (Bennett et al., 2019). This involves mastering your body's interconnectedness (the kinetic chain) (Augustsson et al., 1998; Almansoof et al., 2023; Adeel et al., 2024) and enhancing your body awareness (proprioception) (Riva et al., 2016; Ergen & Ulkar, 2008; Lephart et al., 1997).
  •  How we apply it: Emphasis on perfect form, using specific cues and feedback (including technology) to eliminate compensations and build a powerful mind-muscle connection (Bennett et al., 2019; Blazevich et al., 2020; Hart et al., 2021).

2. Progressive Loading (PL): Challenge, Not Just Weight 

  •  What it is: Increasing the challenge strategically – and only when Structural Integrity and Movement Mastery are solid. This isn't just about adding more plates to the bar.
  •  Why it matters: Progressive overload is crucial, but it can be achieved in many ways: increasing complexity, refining technique, or even adjusting tempo (Plotkin et al., 2022; La Scala Teixeira et al., 2019). We use objective measures (like bar speed) and subjective feedback (like RPE) to guide safe and effective progression (Suchomel et al., 2021; Petro et al., 2024; Morán-Navarro et al., 2017). We also pay close attention to fatigue, as it directly impacts movement quality and injury risk (Barber-Westin & Noyes, 2017; Zago et al., 2021; McLean & Samorezov, 2009). The core principle is always: movement quality first (Bennett et al., 2019; Fisher et al., 2017; Jenkins et al., 2017).
  • How we apply it: Gradual, controlled increases in challenge, dictated by the individual's ability to maintain perfect form. We constantly monitor for fatigue and adjust accordingly.

BCT: A Paradigm Shift in Resistance Training

BCT is not just a collection of exercises; it's a systematic, evidence-based approach that integrates anatomy, physiology, and biomechanics. It's about understanding why exercises work (or don't work) and tailoring training to the individual. This approach, taught in the IFBB Nordic Academy's Advanced Resistance Training Course, empowers trainers to:

  • Maximize Results: By optimizing movement mechanics, BCT unlocks greater strength, power, and hypertrophy potential.
  • Minimize Injury Risk: By respecting structural limitations and prioritizing control, BCT creates a safer training environment.
  • Individualize Training: BCT provides the tools to design truly personalized programs based on individual needs and capabilities.
  • Become True Movement Experts: BCT elevates trainers beyond simply prescribing exercises to becoming masters of human movement.

BCT and the Kinetic Chain

BCT recognizes that the body is an interconnected system – a kinetic chain. Movement at one joint influences movement at other joints. A restriction in ankle mobility, for example, can affect your squat form, placing undue stress on your knees and lower back. BCT emphasizes understanding these relationships and training the body as a whole, integrated unit.

Practical Application of BCT: From Assessment to Exercise Design

The BCT method isn't just theoretical; it's designed for practical application in real-world training scenarios. Here's how it works:

  1. Comprehensive Assessment:

    • Static Postural Assessment: Observing the client's posture in standing and sitting positions to identify any deviations from optimal alignment (e.g., forward head posture, rounded shoulders, excessive lordosis or kyphosis).
    • Range of Motion (ROM) Testing: Assessing the active and passive ROM of major joints (shoulders, hips, knees, ankles, spine) to identify any limitations or asymmetries.
    • Movement Screens: Using standardized movement assessments (e.g., overhead squat, single-leg squat, push-up) to evaluate movement quality and identify any compensations or dysfunctional patterns. This is not primarily for injury prediction (Bennett et al., 2020), but for identifying movement limitations that need to be addressed.
    • Manual Muscle Testing
  2. Identifying Structural Limitations and Movement Dysfunctions: Based on the assessment, the trainer identifies any structural limitations (e.g., limited ankle dorsiflexion, hip internal rotation restriction) and movement dysfunctions (e.g., knee valgus during squatting, scapular winging during pushing movements).

  3. Exercise Selection and Modification:

    • Choosing Exercises: Selecting exercises that target the client's goals while respecting their structural limitations. For example, a client with limited ankle dorsiflexion might initially avoid deep squats and focus on exercises that don't require as much ankle mobility.
    • Modifying Exercises: Adjusting exercise technique (e.g., stance width, grip position, range of motion) to accommodate individual needs and optimize biomechanics. For instance, a client with limited shoulder mobility might use a neutral grip during pressing exercises.
  4. Movement Mastery Drills: Incorporating specific drills to improve movement control and address identified dysfunctions. These might include:

    • Proprioceptive Exercises: Exercises that challenge balance and body awareness (e.g., single-leg balance, exercises on unstable surfaces).
    • Mobility Drills: Exercises that improve joint range of motion (e.g., ankle mobility drills, hip flexor stretches).
    • Motor Control Exercises: Exercises that focus on precise, controlled movement (e.g., slow, deliberate squats with perfect form).
  5. Progressive Loading (with Control): Gradually increasing the challenge (resistance, complexity, speed) only when the client can maintain perfect form. This might involve:

    • Increasing Weight: Adding external load (e.g., dumbbells, barbells, resistance bands).
    • Increasing Repetitions: Performing more repetitions of the same exercise.
    • Decreasing Rest Periods: Reducing the rest time between sets.
    • Increasing Exercise Complexity: Progressing to more challenging variations of the exercise (e.g., from a goblet squat to a front squat).
    • Using Velocity-Based Training (VBT): Monitoring bar speed to ensure that the client is maintaining optimal movement velocity, even as the load increases (Suchomel et al., 2021).
  6. Continuous Monitoring and Adjustment: Regularly reassessing the client's movement quality and adjusting the training program as needed. This is an ongoing process, not a one-time event.

Hypothetical Case Study: Applying BCT to a Squat

Let's imagine a client, Sarah, who wants to improve her squat.

  • Assessment: During the assessment, the trainer observes that Sarah has limited ankle dorsiflexion and exhibits knee valgus (knees collapsing inward) during the squat.
  • Structural Limitation: Limited ankle dorsiflexion.
  • Movement Dysfunction: Knee valgus.
  • Exercise Selection/Modification:
    • Initially, Sarah avoids deep squats. She starts with box squats to a height that allows her to maintain good form.
    • Heel lifts are used temporarily to compensate for the limited ankle dorsiflexion, allowing her to achieve a more upright torso position. This is a short-term solution while addressing the underlying mobility issue.
  • Movement Mastery Drills:
    • Ankle mobility drills (e.g., calf stretches, ankle dorsiflexion exercises with a resistance band).
    • Glute activation exercises (e.g., glute bridges, hip thrusts) to improve hip stability and reduce knee valgus.
    • Slow, controlled bodyweight squats with a focus on maintaining perfect form.
  • Progressive Loading: Once Sarah demonstrates good control and improved ankle mobility, the heel lifts are gradually reduced, and the box height is lowered. Weight is added only when she can maintain perfect form through the full range of motion.
  • Continuous Monitoring: The trainer uses tools to track Sarah's progress and assures correct execution.

This is the BCT difference: We build strength on a foundation of proper movement.

Why Choose the IFBB Nordic Academy and BCT?

  • Evidence-Based: Our methods are grounded in scientific research, not fads or guesswork.
  • Individualized: We teach you to tailor training to each client's unique needs and biomechanics.
  • Results-Oriented: BCT maximizes strength, power, and hypertrophy potential while minimizing injury risk.
  • Career Advancement: Become a highly sought-after trainer with the skills to truly transform your clients' lives.

Ready to become a movement expert? Enroll in the IFBB Nordic Academy's Advanced Resistance Training Course and master the power of Biomechanical Control Training!

Biomechanical Control Training is more than just a training method; it's a paradigm shift. It's about empowering you to become a true expert in human movement. By enrolling in the IFBB Nordic Academy's Advanced Resistance Training Course, you'll gain the knowledge and skills to apply BCT principles, transform your own training, and elevate the results you achieve for your clients. Join us and unlock the next level of resistance training excellence.

 

References

 

Adeel, M., Lin, B., Chaudhary, M., Chen, H., & Peng, C. (2024). Effects of strengthening exercises on human kinetic chains based on a systematic review. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9010022

Almansoof, H., Nuhmani, S., & Muaidi, Q. (2023). Role of kinetic chain in sports performance and injury risk: A narrative review. Journal of Medicine and Life, 16(11), 1591-1596. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0087

Augustsson, J., Esko, A., Thomeé, R., & Svantesson, U. (1998). Weight training of the thigh muscles using closed vs. open kinetic chain exercises: A comparison of performance enhancement. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 27(1), 3-8.  https://doi.org/10.2519/JOSPT.1998.27.1.3   

Barber-Westin, S., & Noyes, F. (2017). Effect of fatigue protocols on lower limb neuromuscular function and implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention training: A systematic review. The American Journal of Sports  Medicine, 45(14), 3388-3396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517693846   

Bennett, H., Arnold, J., Martin, M., Norton, K., & Davison, K. (2019). A randomised controlled trial of movement quality-focused exercise versus traditional resistance exercise for improving movement quality and physical performance in trained adults.  Journal of Sports Sciences,  37(24), 2806-2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1665234   

Bennett, H., Arnold, J., Norton, K., & Davison, K. (2020). Are we really “screening” movement? The role of assessing movement quality in exercise settings. Journal  of Sport and Health Science, 9(6), 489-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.08.002   

Blazevich, A., Wilson, C., Alcaraz, P., & Rubio-Arias, J. (2020). Effects of resistance training movement pattern and velocity on isometric muscular rate of force development: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.  Sports Medicine, 50(5), 943-963.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01239-x   

Castro, A., Karakostis, F., Copes, L., McClendon, H., Trivedi, A., Schwartz, N., & Garland, T. (2021). Effects of selective breeding for voluntary exercise, chronic exercise, and their interaction on muscle attachment site morphology in house mice. Journal of Anatomy, 240(2), 279-295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13547   

Castro, A., McClednon, H., Trivedi, A., Schwartz, N., & Garland, T. (2020). Effects of selective breeding for voluntary exercise, chronic exercise, and their interaction on muscle attachment site morphology in house mice.  The FASEB Journal, 34(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.03689   

Chiu, L. (2017). Biomechanical methods to quantify muscle effort during resistance exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,  31(12). https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002330   

Colado, J., & García-Massó, X. (2009). Technique and safety aspects of resistance exercises: A systematic review of the literature. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 37(2), 104-111.  https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2009.06.1716   

Donnelly, C., Jackson, B., Gucciardi, D., & Reinbolt, J. (2020). Biomechanically-informed training: The four pillars for knee and ACL injury prevention built upon behavior change and motivation principles. Applied Sciences,  10(13), 4470. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134470   

Dooley, K., Snodgrass, S., Stanwell, P., Birse, S., Schultz, A., Drew, M., & Edwards, S. (2020). Spatial muscle activation patterns during different leg exercise protocols in physically active adults using muscle functional MRI: A systematic review.  Journal of Applied Physiology, 130(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00290.2020   

Ergen, E., & Ulkar, B. (2008). Proprioception and ankle injuries in soccer. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2007.10.002

Faigenbaum, A., & Myer, G. (2009). Resistance training among young athletes: Safety, efficacy and injury prevention effects. British Journal of Sports Medicine,  44(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.068098   

Fisher, J., Steele, J., & Smith, D. (2017). High- and low-load resistance training: Interpretation and practical application of current research findings. Sports  Medicine, 47(3), 393-400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0602-1   

Flanagan, S., Kulik, J., & Salem, G. (2015). The limiting joint during a failed squat: A biomechanics case series. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(11), 3134-3142. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000979

Gentil, P., Fisher, J., & Steele, J. (2017). A review of the acute effects and long-term adaptations of single- and multi-joint exercises during resistance training.  Sports Medicine, 47(5), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0627-5   

Hart, R., Smith, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Systematic review of automatic assessment systems for resistance-training movement performance: A data science perspective.  Computers in Biology and Medicine, 137, 104779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104779   

Hewett, T., & Bates, N. (2017). Preventive biomechanics: A paradigm shift with a translational approach to injury prevention. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11), 2654-2664.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516686080   

Hübscher, M., Zech, A., Pfeifer, K., Hänsel, F., Vogt, L., & Banzer, W. (2010). Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention: A systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(3),  413-421. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b88d37   

Jenkins, N., Miramonti, A., Hill, E., Smith, C., Cochrane-Snyman, K., Housh, T., & Cramer, J. (2017). Greater neural adaptations following high- vs. low-load resistance training. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00331

Kipp, K., Harris, C., & Sabick, M. (2011). Lower extremity biomechanics during weightlifting exercise vary across joint and load. Journal of Strength and Conditioning  Research, 25(5), 1229-1234. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da780b   

La Scala Teixeira, C., Evangelista, A., Pereira, P., Da Silva-Grigoletto, M., Bocalini, D., & Behm, D. (2019). Complexity: A novel load progression strategy in strength training. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00839

Lephart, S., Pincivero, D., Giraido, J., & Fu, F. (1997). The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries.  The American Journal of Sports  Medicine, 25(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500126   

Lephart, S., Abt, J., Ferris, C., Sell, T., Nagai, T., Myers, J., & Irrgang, J. (2005). Neuromuscular and biomechanical characteristic changes in high school athletes: A plyometric versus basic resistance program. British Journal of Sports Medicine,  39(12), 932-938. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.019083   

Lloyd, D. (2021). The future of in-field sports biomechanics: Wearables plus modelling compute real-time in vivo tissue loading to prevent and repair musculoskeletal injuries.  Sports Biomechanics, 20(1), 1-29.* [https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1959947](https://doi.org/10.10   

McLean, S., & Samorezov, J. (2009). Fatigue-induced ACL injury risk stems from a degradation in central control. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(8), 1661-1672. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819ca07b

Moir, G., Brimmer, S., Snyder, B., Connaboy, C., & Lamont, H. (2017). Mechanical limitations to sprinting and biomechanical solutions: A constraints-led framework for the incorporation of resistance training to develop sprinting speed. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 40(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000358

Morán-Navarro, R., Martínez-Cava, A., Sánchez-Medina, L., Mora-Rodriguez, R., González-Badillo, J., & Pallarés, J. (2017). Movement velocity as a measure of level of effort during resistance exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(6), 1496-1504. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002017

Myer, G., Ford, K., Palumbo, O., & Hewett, T. (2005).  Neuromuscular training improves performance and lower-extremity biomechanics in female athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1519/13643.1   

Pánics, G., Tállay,  A., Pavlik, A., & Berkes, I. (2008). Effect of proprioception training on knee  joint position sense in female team handball players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(6), 472-476. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.046516   

Petro, J., Ferrari, G., Cardozo, L., Vargas-Molina, S., Carbone, L., Kreider, R., & Bonilla, D. (2024). Validity of rating of perceived exertion scales in relation to movement velocity and exercise intensity during resistance-exercise: A systematic review. Sports Health, 16(4), 608-623. https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241260412

Plotkin, D., Coleman, M., Van Every, D., Maldonado, J., Oberlin, D., Israetel, M., ... & Schoenfeld, B. (2022). Progressive overload without progressing load? The effects of load or repetition progression on muscular adaptations. PeerJ, 10, e14142. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14142     

Riva, D., Bianchi, R., Rocca, F., & Mamo, C. (2016). Proprioceptive training and injury prevention  in a professional men's basketball team: A six-year prospective study. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(2), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001097   

Sasaki, S., Tsuda, E., Yamamoto, Y., Maeda, S., Kimura,  Y., Fujita, Y., & Ishibashi, Y. (2019). Core-muscle training and neuromuscular control of lower limb and trunk. Journal of Athletic Training, 54(9), 959-967. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-113-17   

Suchomel, T., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C., Hornsby, W.,  & Stone, M. (2021). Training for muscular strength: Methods for monitoring and adjusting training intensity. Sports Medicine, 51(10), 2051-2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01488-9   

Tagliaferri, C., Wittrant,  Y., Davicco, M., Walrand, S., & Coxam, V. (2015). Muscle and bone, two interconnected tissues. Ageing Research Reviews, 21, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.03.002   

Van Roie, E., Walker, S., Van Driessche, S., Delabastita, T., Vanwanseele, B.,  & Delecluse, C. (2020). An age-adapted plyometric exercise program improves dynamic strength, jump  performance and functional capacity in older men either similarly or more than traditional resistance training. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0237921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237921    

Vanrenterghem, J., Nedergaard, N.,  Robinson, M., & Drust, B. (2017). Training load monitoring in team sports: A novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Medicine, 47(11), 2135-2142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0714-2   

Walker, S., Blazevich, A., Haff, G., Tufano, J., Newton, R., & Häkkinen, K. (2016). Greater strength gains after training with accentuated eccentric than traditional isoinertial loads in already strength-trained men. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00149

Washabaugh, E., Augenstein,  T., & Krishnan, C. (2020). Functional resistance training during walking: Mode of application differentially affects gait biomechanics and muscle activation patterns. Gait & Posture, 75, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.024  

Wilson, C., Perkin, O., Mcguigan, M., & Stokes, K. (2016). The effect of age on technique variability and outcome variability during a leg press. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0163764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764 

Zago, M., David, S., Bertozzi,  F., Brunetti, C., Gatti, A., Salaorni, F., ... & Galli, M. (2021). Fatigue induced by repeated changes of direction in élite female football (soccer) players: Impact on lower limb biomechanics and implications for ACL injury prevention. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 666841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.666841   

Zhao, F. (2024). The application of sports biomechanics in sports injury prevention and rehabilitation. Frontiers in Sport Research, 6(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.25236/fsr.2024.060320

Zwolski, C., Quatman‐Yates, C., & Paterno, M. (2017). Resistance training in youth: Laying the foundation for injury prevention and physical literacy. Sports Health, 9(5), 436-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738117704153

 

Ready to take your coaching skills to the elite level? Join the IFBB Master Coach Program and gain the knowledge, techniques, and confidence to coach athletes to success. Don’t miss this chance to learn from world-renowned experts and earn a globally recognized certification! Enroll today and unlock your full potential as a Master Coach.

Read More IFBB Master Coach Program

Stay connected with news and updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Don't worry, your information will not be shared.

We hate SPAM. We will never sell your information, for any reason.